Skip to content
Haven
Browse local research

F0944

Usually procedural

Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.

F0944 is almost always cited at the no-harm or potential-for-harm level, which usually means a process, storage, or documentation problem rather than an injured resident. It is common: 286 facilities have at least one. Frequent repeats can still signal weak management.

Times cited
307
0.1% of all citations
Facilities cited
286
Immediate jeopardy
0
Serious injury likely or occurred
From complaints
24.8%
vs routine inspection

How severe are F0944 citations?

CMS grades every citation on a scope-and-severity grid from A to L. The letter matters far more than the tag number.

Immediate jeopardy (J–L)0 (0.0%)

Serious injury, harm, or death has occurred or is likely to occur imminently.

Actual harm (G–I)0 (0.0%)

A resident was actually harmed, though not in immediate danger.

Potential for harm (D–F)254 (82.7%)

No harm occurred, but the problem could cause more than minimal harm.

No actual harm (A–C)53 (17.3%)

A deficiency with minimal potential for harm — often a paperwork or process issue.

97.1% of F0944citations reached an accepted correction date in the federal file — so a citation on a facility's record is almost always a problem that was closed out, not one still running. That is exactly why the letter matters more than the count. The number worth noticing is the other end: 1.63% of F0944 citations show no plan of correction at all.

Where F0944 is cited most

Raw counts follow state size and how aggressively each state's survey agency inspects — they are not a ranking of care quality.

What to ask if a facility has this citation

  • What specifically happened, and when? Ask for the survey date and the finding itself, not a summary.
  • What severity letter was it? A D is a different conversation than a G or a J.
  • What changed afterward? Ask for the plan of correction and who is accountable for it.
  • Has this tag come up in more than one survey year? A repeat is the real signal.
  • Can I speak to the administrator or director of nursing about it? Reluctance is itself an answer.

Common questions

What does F0944 mean in a nursing home inspection?

F0944 is the federal deficiency tag for: Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program. It falls under the Administration Deficiencies and is cited when an inspector finds a facility out of compliance with that requirement.

How serious is an F0944 citation?

Of 307 F0944 citations nationally, 0 were immediate jeopardy (the most serious band), 0 involved actual harm, 254 were potential-for-harm, and 53 were no-harm findings. 0% involved actual harm or worse.

How common is F0944?

F0944 has been cited 307 times across 286 nursing homes, which is 0.1% of all health-inspection citations in the current federal file. 24.8% of these citations came from a complaint investigation rather than a routine annual survey.

Should I rule out a facility with an F0944 citation?

Not on the tag alone. Read the actual finding, the severity letter, whether it was corrected, and whether the same problem repeats across survey years. A single corrected citation at a facility that otherwise rates well is very different from a pattern. Ask the administrator directly — they are required to discuss their inspection record with you.

Trying to judge a specific facility?

Compare up to four side by side — citations, staffing, abuse flags, and cost — then use the results to prepare written questions for each community. Confirm current price, availability, and care acceptance directly with the community.