Skip to content
Haven
Browse local research

F0923

Usually procedural

Have enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.

F0923 is almost always cited at the no-harm or potential-for-harm level, which usually means a process, storage, or documentation problem rather than an injured resident. It is common: 133 facilities have at least one. Frequent repeats can still signal weak management.

Times cited
139
0.0% of all citations
Facilities cited
133
Immediate jeopardy
0
Serious injury likely or occurred
From complaints
23%
vs routine inspection

How severe are F0923 citations?

CMS grades every citation on a scope-and-severity grid from A to L. The letter matters far more than the tag number.

Immediate jeopardy (J–L)0 (0.0%)

Serious injury, harm, or death has occurred or is likely to occur imminently.

Actual harm (G–I)0 (0.0%)

A resident was actually harmed, though not in immediate danger.

Potential for harm (D–F)137 (98.6%)

No harm occurred, but the problem could cause more than minimal harm.

No actual harm (A–C)2 (1.4%)

A deficiency with minimal potential for harm — often a paperwork or process issue.

98.6% of F0923citations reached an accepted correction date in the federal file — so a citation on a facility's record is almost always a problem that was closed out, not one still running. That is exactly why the letter matters more than the count. The number worth noticing is the other end: 0.72% of F0923 citations show no plan of correction at all.

Where F0923 is cited most

Raw counts follow state size and how aggressively each state's survey agency inspects — they are not a ranking of care quality.

What to ask if a facility has this citation

  • What specifically happened, and when? Ask for the survey date and the finding itself, not a summary.
  • What severity letter was it? A D is a different conversation than a G or a J.
  • What changed afterward? Ask for the plan of correction and who is accountable for it.
  • Has this tag come up in more than one survey year? A repeat is the real signal.
  • Can I speak to the administrator or director of nursing about it? Reluctance is itself an answer.

Common questions

What does F0923 mean in a nursing home inspection?

F0923 is the federal deficiency tag for: Have enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both. It falls under the Environmental Deficiencies and is cited when an inspector finds a facility out of compliance with that requirement.

How serious is an F0923 citation?

Of 139 F0923 citations nationally, 0 were immediate jeopardy (the most serious band), 0 involved actual harm, 137 were potential-for-harm, and 2 were no-harm findings. 0% involved actual harm or worse.

How common is F0923?

F0923 has been cited 139 times across 133 nursing homes, which is 0.0% of all health-inspection citations in the current federal file. 23% of these citations came from a complaint investigation rather than a routine annual survey.

Should I rule out a facility with an F0923 citation?

Not on the tag alone. Read the actual finding, the severity letter, whether it was corrected, and whether the same problem repeats across survey years. A single corrected citation at a facility that otherwise rates well is very different from a pattern. Ask the administrator directly — they are required to discuss their inspection record with you.

Trying to judge a specific facility?

Compare up to four side by side — citations, staffing, abuse flags, and cost — then use the results to prepare written questions for each community. Confirm current price, availability, and care acceptance directly with the community.